About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
and focus on that. the system separate from the government eliminate the model with the private sector benefit from the government guarantee come in many government race, private sector rewards. nature the secondary market was privately financed capital we insist on government funds. the maximum cutting a private sector was not the part of the bill portion of it. historically housing right to recovery. we need an alternative rapidly. thank you. >> the china recognizes general from california, mr. sherman for a minute and a half. >> in the 1930s detroit dat is no federal and home finance it did not work out. then we tried the gse model for organizations run by those reported for profit had a full implicit guarantee. so they took risks to benefit shareholders on the taxpayers, so that is not something we should return to. i'll agree with the chairman but if that's as far as it goes. but i do think we need a federal agency for more than one involved in the market. otherwise we'll see the end of the 30 year mortgage at fixed rates available to average middle-class families. what percentage
don't have time. whether redraw the limit regarding the use of drones that government agencies, where to reach out that line? under what circumstances do we require search warrant click should police use only for surveillance? of local government allowed jones to search for traffic violations and building code violation? should the federal government use drones to see whether their fraudulent clicks were reasonable limitations are appropriate for where and when to use drones. additionally, in examining the use, congress needs to examine the use and limits by private citizens in the air. where do we draw the line of balancing immediacy under the first amendment to be protected from invasion of privacy. another area is innovative use of drones and coming from a rural state as a chairman does, we have a lot of agriculture. drones can be used by farmers to help a farmer survey crops were quickly for early signs of disease. subform a spray crops to maintain baker, check livestock, prevent livestock and equipment. these are all timesaving and cost-saving benefits to agriculture. no farmer w
have medication that not only can prevent you from this, that the federal government considers antiviral treatment. so this is being able to change this. it didn't take away the eligibility category, but it allows states not be penalized for it in 26 states, you are not eligible at all states are still making. here is the map where they are. this is part of things that have been moved. as you can see, 27 had expressed support. seven of them are still weighing options and the rest of them are opposed. what does this mean for people with hiv? perhaps on the good news side, about% of people live in those states that have expressed theirs. 29% live in states with programs. but florida, for example, the florida legislature is not in support. 11% of people with hiv live in florida. as you can see, and i will make this clear, all of those states on the bottom, that as a challenge. even if all states were to expand medicaid, we know that insurance covered it alone does not equal access to care. it is the nation's safety net for people with hiv. the resources and gaps in care, we need t
the government with different culture were merged to a new department. in the early days at the department, the focus of both the administration and congress was moving quickly to prevent another 9/11-type attack on the homeland. management took a backseat to the effort. the dhs confirmed the fact when he testified before the committee last year. the management got shortchanged in the early days. it's taken years to dig out but the lack of the strong foundation left. that said, i want to give credit where credit is due. gao's recent report confirms there's considerable progress at the department. and integrating the departments and overlaying the component. the latest high-risk report includes fair amount of good news. because gao acknowledges the progress and narrowed the area on the high-risk list. the department deserves credit for the detailed plan to address all of gao's concerns and high-risk report, which i believe is unique among all the agencies on the high-risk list. i want to briefly review the improvements. in doing so i agree with gao permitted leadership of dhs has been criti
government agencies in ways that let things happen that wouldn't otherwise. and i'm pleased to join senator brown in offering this to the senate. mrs. murray: madam president? the presiding officer: the senator from washington. mrs. murray: mr. president, i don't believe there's any opposition to this amendment and i ask that we take it by voice vote. the presiding officer: all those in favor say aye. all those opposed, nay. the ayes have it. the amendment is agreed to. mrs. murray: move to reconsider. a senator: lay on the table. the presiding officer: without objection. under the previous order, two minutes of debate equally divided prior to a vote in relation to amendment number 5 597, offered by the senator from south carolina, mr. scott. the senator from south carolina. mr. scott con. thank you. my amendment is very simple. it prohibits the automatic deduction of union dues from federal employees' paychecks. i yield back the balance of my time. the presiding officer: who yields time in opposition? mrs. murray: madam president, has -- the presiding officer: the senator from washington.
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5